Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| 2019-06-12 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and Green | Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 Active has a general score of 81.9, which is much better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's overall score of 73.9. The Galaxy S8 Active design is a bit lighter than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, although it is a bit thicker and was released just a little further than a year before. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active features a little sharper screen than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity in each screen inch and a higher 1440 x 2960px resolution. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same video quality, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a back facing camera with a much higher 48 MP resolution, better 60 fps video frame rates and a much larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 2 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.