Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| 2019-06-12 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and Green | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is much better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, getting a overall score of 83.3 against 73.9. The Galaxy S9 body is a lot lighter and somewhat thinner than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, even though it was released a bit more over a year before. Galaxy S9 has a bit more vivid display than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a greater screen pixel density.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy S9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has 4 GB more RAM. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a much better camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also counts with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs and videos.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a much longer battery performance than Galaxy S9, because it has a 4065mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.