Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-06-12 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 390 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's global score of 73.9. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro construction is newer than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's, although it's much thicker and heavier. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit sharper display than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better pixels number per inch of display.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has more RAM memory. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a better memory to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit longer battery life than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4065mAh. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a way more MP back-facing camera and a way larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.