Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, having an 81 score against 73.9. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is an a bit heavier and just a little thicker phone than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom and the Galaxy XCover Pro both count with extremely similar displays, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a quite greater number of pixels in each inch in the screen.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a battery duration that's very similar to the battery duration in OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a 0% lower battery size. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom captures way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a same size aperture, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a much bigger sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photographs, a back camera with a much higher resolution and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.