Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Green | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is much better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, with an 88.5 score against 73.9. Even when Galaxy Z Flip and OPPO Reno 10x Zoom were released with only a few months difference, Galaxy Z Flip is lighter and way thinner. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit better CPU than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit better looking display than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has a quite bigger screen, a just a little more pixels per inch in the display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2636px resolution. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a larger aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited situations, a way more mega pixels back facing camera and a lot larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures.
The Galaxy Z Flip and OPPO Reno 10x Zoom count with incredibly similar memory capacity for games and applications, both have equal 256 GB internal memory. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 23 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.