Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black and Green | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is a lot better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's global score of 73.9. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a newer and notably thinner device than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, but it's also incredibly heavier. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a screen that's very similar to the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom one, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a bigger display and a better 1768 x 2208 resolution.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit more powerful processor than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller sensor taking worse quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also counts with a much higher resolution back-facing camera and a larger aperture.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom and the Galaxy Z Fold 2 count with extremely similar memory to store more games and applications, both of them have equal internal memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit better battery duration than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.