Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Sony |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-06-12 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Green | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ2 Compact is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, with a 79 score against 73.9. Xperia XZ2 Compact's body is notably lighter than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, although it's incredibly thicker and was released only 14 months before. Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a better display than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better pixels quantity in each inch of screen.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a quite bigger memory to install games and applications than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a bit better processing power than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has more RAM.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a much better camera than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera, a larger sensor capturing better quality pictures and a bigger diafragm aperture.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a much longer battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 4065mAh battery size instead of 2870mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.