Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Sony |
| 2019-06-12 | 2018-07-30 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Black and Green | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Premium has a global score of 82.2, which is much better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's general score of 73.9. Although it's the best in our current comparison, Xperia XZ2 Premium is an older, a little heavier and much thicker phone than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom. The Xperia XZ2 Premium features a CPU that's just as good as OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's CPU, and although the Xperia XZ2 Premium has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Xperia XZ2 Premium features a much better screen than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better pixels quantity per inch in the screen and a lot better resolution of 2160 x 3840 pixels. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a greater memory for apps and games than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a better camera than Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a larger sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures, better 60 frames per second video frame rates, a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and a way better resolution camera.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 15% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.