Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Sony |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia Z4v has a global score of 78.8, which is slightly better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's overall score of 73.9. Despite of the fact that the Xperia Z4v is notably older than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, it's construction is a bit thinner and lighter. Xperia Z4v counts with a brighter display than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution and more pixels per inch of display.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Xperia Z4v, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with just a bit better processing power than Sony Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, and they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also counts with more RAM.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a much better camera than Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same video resolution, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a back camera with a much better resolution, faster video frame rates, a bigger diafragm aperture and a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a much better battery lifetime than Xperia Z4v, because it has a 4065mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.