Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Sony |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2015-09-02 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.08 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 545.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 3840 pixels (4K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 801 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 10.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 630 hours standby time 15.2 hours talk time |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xperia Z5 Premium is slightly better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, with a 79.8 score against 73.9. Xperia Z5 Premium's body is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Xperia Z5 Premium features a much more vibrant display than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 3840 x 2160 pixels and a lot more pixels per display inch.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a bit better processing unit than Xperia Z5 Premium, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, and they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also counts with more RAM memory. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom captures much clearer photos and videos than Xperia Z5 Premium, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rate, a bigger diafragm aperture, a larger sensor which provides a higher image and video quality and a way better 48 MP resolution camera.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia Z5 Premium, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with better battery duration than Xperia Z5 Premium, because it has a 4065mAh battery size against 3430mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.