Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| 2019-06-12 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is much better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, with a overall score of 83.8 against 73.9. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is an older cellphone than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, but Xiaomi was able to build it lighter and thinner anyway. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom and Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s have incredibly similar displays, because although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a quite smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater amount of pixels in each inch in the screen.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a CPU that is just as good as the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom one, they have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom shoots way better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a much larger back camera sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality, faster video frame rate, a way more mega pixels camera and a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography in poorly lited situations.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with as much storage for applications, games, photos and videos as OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, they have equal internal storage. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 20% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.