Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and Green | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a score of 81.1, which is a bit better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's score of 73.9. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a newer device, and it is also a little thinner and just a little lighter than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although it has a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, a little bit inferior number of pixels per inch of screen and a little smaller display.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a bit better processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little bit better camera than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photographs and a back facing camera with a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has improved battery duration than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 4065mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.