Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and Green | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a general score of 79, which is a little bit better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's 73.9 general score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S construction is newer, a little bit thinner and a bit lighter than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a higher amount of RAM.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a slightly better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a quite lower pixels number per display inch and a bit smaller display. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a same size camera sensor, a 48 megapixels camera and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures in poorly lited situations.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features greater battery lifetime than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has a 5020mAh battery size instead of 4065mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.