Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-18 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 Plus has a score of 87.1, which is much better than OPPO Reno2's global score of 73.9. The iPhone 8 Plus construction is thinner than the OPPO Reno2, but it is a little bit heavier and was released many years before. The Apple iPhone 8 Plus counts with a little better hardware performance than OPPO Reno2, because although it has an inferior number of cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The iPhone 8 Plus has a bit more vivid screen than OPPO Reno2, although it has a just a bit worse screen density, a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution and a bit smaller display. The OPPO Reno2 shoots much better photos and videos than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno2 also counts with a bigger camera aperture, a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a way larger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
The OPPO Reno2 has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone 8 Plus, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the OPPO Reno2 also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB. The OPPO Reno2 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.