Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-18 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is much better than the OPPO Reno2's 73.9 general score. The Apple iPhone X construction is a little lighter and thinner than OPPO Reno2, although it was released 2 years before. Apple iPhone X has just a bit better looking screen than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a quite higher pixels quantity per display inch.
The iPhone X counts with a little better processing power than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The OPPO Reno2 has a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have the same 256 GB internal storage, the OPPO Reno2 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB.
OPPO Reno2 features a way better battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. The OPPO Reno2 has a superior camera than iPhone X, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno2 also counts with a lot better resolution back facing camera, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality and a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.