Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-18 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR has a general score of 82, which is much better than the OPPO Reno2's score of 73.9. IPhone XR is an older and a little bit heavier cellphone than the OPPO Reno2, but Apple was able to make it somewhat thinner anyway. The Apple iPhone XR features a better processing power than OPPO Reno2, because although it has lesser cores and 5 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
IPhone XR features a little bit better looking display than OPPO Reno2, although it has a just a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch of display, a quite smaller display and a way worse resolution of 828 x 1792px. OPPO Reno2 has a much better camera than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno2 also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution, a much bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light images.
The OPPO Reno2 features much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone XR, because it has a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB and 192 GB more internal storage capacity. OPPO Reno2 features greater battery performance than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 36 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.