Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-18 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS is better than OPPO Reno2, getting an 84.2 score against 73.9. Although the Apple iPhone XS is older than the OPPO Reno2, it's construction is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter. IPhone XS has a bit sharper screen than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a bit higher quantity of pixels per screen inch.
The OPPO Reno2 counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than iPhone XS, because it has more internal storage and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The iPhone XS has a superior processor than OPPO Reno2, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster) and 4 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The OPPO Reno2 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno2 also counts with a much higher resolution back facing camera, a way bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a larger camera aperture to take better photos in low light environments.
OPPO Reno2 features a very superior battery life than iPhone XS, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2659mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.