Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-18 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel has an overall score of 80.2, which is slightly better than the OPPO Reno2's global score of 73.9. Google Pixel's design is a little thinner and noticeably lighter than OPPO Reno2, although it was released many years before. Google Pixel features a little more vivid display than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a really smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a little bit better pixel density.
OPPO Reno2 has a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel, because it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB and more internal memory. The OPPO Reno2 has a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel, because it has a higher number of cores (and they are faster) and 4 GB more RAM.
OPPO Reno2 shoots much better videos and photos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Reno2 also has a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a back camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light captures.
OPPO Reno2 features a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.