Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-18 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a global score of 80, which is slightly better than the OPPO Reno2's score of 73.9. The Google Pixel 3 body is noticeably lighter and thinner than the OPPO Reno2, even though it was released about a year before. Google Pixel 3 features a little sharper screen than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
OPPO Reno2 counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Google Pixel 3 counts with just a bit better performance than OPPO Reno2, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The OPPO Reno2 has a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. OPPO Reno2 has a better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the OPPO Reno2 also has a lot larger sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited environments and a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.