Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-18 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has a score of 78.8, which is slightly better than the OPPO Reno2's global score of 73.9. Both phones we are comparing work with Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 3a has newer 11 version while OPPO Reno2 has Android 10 version, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features. Google Pixel 3a is a somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter phone than the OPPO Reno2, even when both were released with only 5 months difference.
Google Pixel 3a has a little bit better screen than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2220 and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of screen. The OPPO Reno2 counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB.
OPPO Reno2 has a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Reno2 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. OPPO Reno2 has a much better camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Reno2 also has a back camera with a way better resolution, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photos and a bigger aperture to capture better images in low light environments.
The OPPO Reno2 has superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.