Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has an overall score of 82.9, which is better than OPPO Reno2's overall score of 73.9. Google Pixel 4a's design is newer, extremely lighter and somewhat thinner than OPPO Reno2. These phones use Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 4a has the newer 11 version while OPPO Reno2 has Android 10, so it provides some nice extra features.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a processing unit that is very similar to OPPO Reno2's CPU, and although the Google Pixel 4a has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Google Pixel 4a has a little bit better screen than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of display.
The OPPO Reno2 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB. OPPO Reno2 shoots better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno2 also has a much bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot more MP camera in the back.
OPPO Reno2 counts with improved battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 27% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.