Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than the OPPO Reno2, getting a overall score of 87.5 against 73.9. The Google Pixel 4a 5G body is newer, lighter and somewhat thinner than the OPPO Reno2. Both phones we compare here include Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has a more recent 11 version and OPPO Reno2 has Android 10 version, so it counts with a lot of extra features and improved performance.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit better hardware performance than OPPO Reno2, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a slightly better screen than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a little bit better screen density.
The OPPO Reno2 captures better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno2 also counts with a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The OPPO Reno2 features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB more internal storage capacity. The OPPO Reno2 counts with just a little better battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.