Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-18 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has an overall score of 89, which is much better than the OPPO Reno2's global score of 73.9. The Google Pixel 5 construction is newer, extremely lighter and somewhat thinner than OPPO Reno2. The Google Pixel 5 features just a bit better looking screen than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a little bit higher count of pixels per inch of screen.
The Google Pixel 5 has a little bit better performance than OPPO Reno2. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. OPPO Reno2 takes better videos and photos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno2 also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos.
OPPO Reno2 features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because it has more internal memory and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Google Pixel 5 has a little better battery lifetime than OPPO Reno2, because it has a 2% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.