Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 has a score of 77.7, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Reno2's score of 73.9. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but HTC One M9 has the older 5.0 version and OPPO Reno2 has Android 10. Although HTC One M9 is way older and just a bit thicker than OPPO Reno2, it's design is still somewhat lighter.
HTC One M9 counts with a much better display than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a much smaller display and a bit lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display. The HTC One M9 counts with a little faster processor than OPPO Reno2, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics processor and a 64 bits CPU.
OPPO Reno2 has a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One M9, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 256 GB internal storage capacity. The OPPO Reno2 features a really longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
The OPPO Reno2 has a superior camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Reno2 also has a way larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos, a bigger camera sensor capturing higher quality photographs and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.