Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-18 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra has a global score of 77, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno2's 73.9 overall score. Even though the HTC U Ultra is way older than the OPPO Reno2, it's construction is lighter and somewhat thinner. HTC U Ultra counts with a little bit better looking display than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
OPPO Reno2 features more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The OPPO Reno2 has just a little better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger number of cores and 4 GB more RAM memory.
The OPPO Reno2 counts with a much better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Reno2 also has a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture.
The OPPO Reno2 has superior battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 33 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.