Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-18 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U11 is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno2, with a general score of 77.6 against 73.9. Despite of the fact that HTC U11 is a lot older than the OPPO Reno2, it's construction is thinner and lighter. HTC U11 features a little bit better screen than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better number of pixels per display inch.
HTC U11 has a bit superior processor than OPPO Reno2, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. OPPO Reno2 counts with much more storage to install applications and games than HTC U11, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB and 256 GB internal storage capacity.
OPPO Reno2 counts with improved battery duration than HTC U11, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. OPPO Reno2 shoots much better pictures and videos than HTC U11, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a F1.7 aperture, the OPPO Reno2 also has a lot more MP back facing camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.