Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-10-18 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 Fit is slightly better than OPPO Reno2, having a global score of 77 against 73.9. These phones use Android operating system, but LG G7 Fit has the newer 8.1 Oreo version and OPPO Reno2 has Android 10 version, providing the user a lot of extra features. LG G7 Fit is an older phone than the OPPO Reno2, but LG could make it somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter.
LG G7 Fit has a much better display than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a higher number of pixels per inch in the display. OPPO Reno2 features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity.
OPPO Reno2 features a little bit better performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has more RAM memory and 4 more cores. The OPPO Reno2 shoots much clearer photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the OPPO Reno2 also has a way larger camera aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited situations, a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing way better quality pictures and a back camera with way more megapixels.
OPPO Reno2 has improved battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.