Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is much better than the OPPO Reno2, having a overall score of 85.4 against 73.9. Both phones we compare here have the same Android 10 OS, so they should give the same OS features. LG K92's body is newer and somewhat thinner than OPPO Reno2's, but it is just a little bit heavier. The OPPO Reno2 features a bit sharper display than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the OPPO Reno2 also counts with a just a little higher screen density.
The OPPO Reno2 counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than LG K92, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. OPPO Reno2 counts with a little faster processor than LG K92, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The LG K92 shoots a little bit better photos and videos than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same sensor size and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG K92 also counts with a lot higher resolution camera.
The LG K92 has a battery lifetime that's very similar to OPPO Reno2's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.