Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-10-18 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has a global score of 82.5, which is better than the OPPO Reno2's 73.9 overall score. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but LG V30S ThinQ has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and OPPO Reno2 has Android 10, giving lots of additional features. The LG V30S ThinQ is an older cellphone than the OPPO Reno2, but LG was able to make it somewhat lighter and notably thinner anyway.
The LG V30S ThinQ features just a bit better looking display than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processor than OPPO Reno2, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The OPPO Reno2 has a much better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the OPPO Reno2 also counts with a back camera with much more mega pixels and a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
The OPPO Reno2 counts with just a bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage. OPPO Reno2 counts with superior battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.