Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-18 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than OPPO Reno2's general score of 73.9. Although the LG V35 ThinQ is older than the OPPO Reno2, it's body is lighter and incredibly thinner. LG V35 ThinQ features a bit sharper screen than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880.
The OPPO Reno2 counts with more storage for apps and games than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has an external SD slot that admits 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The LG V35 ThinQ has a little faster processor than OPPO Reno2, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The OPPO Reno2 features superior battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. OPPO Reno2 counts with a superior camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures or videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno2 also counts with a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.