Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is a bit better than the OPPO Reno2, with a score of 81.2 against 73.9. Despite of the fact that LG V40 ThinQ is older than the OPPO Reno2, it's body is lighter and somewhat thinner. Both of these phones use the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so both of them should give very similar OS features.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a bit faster processing unit than OPPO Reno2, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little sharper display than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixel density and a better 1440 x 3120 resolution.
The OPPO Reno2 captures better videos and photos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has worse video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking images and video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno2 also counts with a way bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The OPPO Reno2 has a greater storage to install applications and games than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has an external SD slot that admits 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The OPPO Reno2 has improved battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.