Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is much better than OPPO Reno2, having a overall score of 87.6 against 73.9. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V60 ThinQ has a more recent 11 version while OPPO Reno2 has Android 10 version. Although LG V60 ThinQ and the OPPO Reno2 were only released with a couple months difference, the LG V60 ThinQ design is heavier but also a bit thinner than the OPPO Reno2.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a little better processing power than OPPO Reno2. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM memory and 8 processing cores. OPPO Reno2 and LG V60 ThinQ both have really similar displays, because although the LG V60 ThinQ has a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a quite larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px.
The OPPO Reno2 counts with a much better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a lot less MP back-facing camera, a smaller sensor giving a worse image quality and a lot worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better photos in low light environments.
The OPPO Reno2 counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity for apps and games than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB more internal storage capacity. LG V60 ThinQ counts with superior battery performance than OPPO Reno2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.