Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is better than the OPPO Reno2, getting an 83.4 score against 73.9. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a more recent 13 version and OPPO Reno2 has Android 10, providing the user lots of additional features. Although Motorola Edge 40 Pro is just a little heavier than OPPO Reno2, it's a little thinner and notably newer.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a little bit better looking screen than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a little bit inferior count of pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a little bit bigger screen. The OPPO Reno2 counts with a very superior memory to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, and although they both have equal 256 GB internal storage, the OPPO Reno2 also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The OPPO Reno2 features a much better performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a little longer battery life than OPPO Reno2, because it has a 15% greater battery capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a superior camera than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting photos and videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a back camera with more megapixels, a much larger sensor providing a way better image quality and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.