Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G has a score of 86.2, which is better than the OPPO Reno2's 73.9 general score. Moto G200 5G's design is incredibly newer and just a little bit thinner, but also a bit heavier than the OPPO Reno2. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto G200 5G has a more recent 11 version while OPPO Reno2 has Android 10 version, offering some extra features and a performance increase.
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a screen that is very similar to the OPPO Reno2 one, because although the Motorola Moto G200 5G has a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bigger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460. The Moto G200 5G counts with just a bit better processing power than OPPO Reno2. Both have 8 cpu cores and 8 GB of RAM.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G has a little bit better camera than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light images and video, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also counts with a way higher 108 mega pixels resolution back camera.
The OPPO Reno2 counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G200 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto G200 5G features greater battery performance than OPPO Reno2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.