Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-10-18 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z Force is a bit better than the OPPO Reno2, getting a 75.8 score against 73.9. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Moto Z Force has 7.0 Nougat version and OPPO Reno2 has Android 10 version, so it provides some nice extra features and increased performance. Motorola Moto Z Force is an incredibly older phone than the OPPO Reno2, but it's incredibly thinner and somewhat lighter anyway.
The OPPO Reno2 features a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has more 2.2 GHz processing cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Moto Z Force has a slightly better looking display than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The OPPO Reno2 features a bigger storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The OPPO Reno2 has just a little better battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
OPPO Reno2 counts with a superior camera than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the OPPO Reno2 also has a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.