Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-18 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto Z2 Play has an overall score of 77.4, which is just a bit better than OPPO Reno2's 73.9 overall score. Although Moto Z2 Play is extremely older than the OPPO Reno2, it's design is much thinner and lighter. OPPO Reno2 has a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Reno2 also has more RAM.
The OPPO Reno2 counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a bigger screen and a just a bit higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. OPPO Reno2 counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has an external memory slot that allows 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
OPPO Reno2 has greater battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The OPPO Reno2 counts with a way better camera than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same video quality, a same size camera aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the OPPO Reno2 also has a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.