Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-10-18 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z3 is slightly better than the OPPO Reno2, with a general score of 77.6 against 73.9. The Moto Z3 is an older device than the OPPO Reno2, but it is notably thinner and lighter anyway. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto Z3 has the newer 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Reno2 has Android 10, counting with some nice extra features.
The Moto Z3 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than OPPO Reno2, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Moto Z3 features a display that is just as good as the screen in OPPO Reno2, although the Motorola Moto Z3 has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, a little bit inferior pixels quantity per inch in the display and a little smaller screen.
OPPO Reno2 counts with a greater camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno2 also has a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels, a lot larger sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality and a larger aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited situations.
The OPPO Reno2 has a better memory for applications and games than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The OPPO Reno2 features longer battery performance than Moto Z3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.