Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-18 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z3 Play has an overall score of 76.3, which is slightly better than OPPO Reno2's 73.9 overall score. Moto Z3 Play's construction is noticeably thinner and lighter than the OPPO Reno2, although it was released just a little over a year before. The OPPO Reno2 counts with a little bit better looking display than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, a little bit more pixels per inch of display and a bit larger screen.
The OPPO Reno2 has a better memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The OPPO Reno2 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Reno2 also has more RAM.
The OPPO Reno2 counts with a superior camera than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same aperture, the OPPO Reno2 also has a lot bigger sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality and a way higher resolution camera in the back.
The OPPO Reno2 counts with improved battery duration than Moto Z3 Play, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.