Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has a score of 79.8, which is slightly better than OPPO Reno2's overall score of 73.9. Even though Motorola One Hyper and OPPO Reno2 were released with only 2 months difference, the Motorola One Hyper construction is a bit thinner but also a little bit heavier. Both phones we are comparing here include Android operating system, but the Motorola One Hyper has a more recent 11 version and OPPO Reno2 has Android 10 version, so it gives you a lot of extra features and performance tweaks.
OPPO Reno2 counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a display of the same size, the OPPO Reno2 also has a quite higher display pixels density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. OPPO Reno2 has more storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports 488 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Reno2 has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Reno2 also has more RAM memory. Motorola One Hyper's battery duration is very similar to the battery life in OPPO Reno2. The OPPO Reno2 shoots clearer photos and videos than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way lower 48 MP resolution and a lower video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.