Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-18 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 3S is slightly better than OPPO Reno2, having a general score of 75.8 against 73.9. These phones include Android OS, but the nubia Red Magic 3S has a newer 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Reno2 has Android 10, so it gives you some additional features and performance optimizations. Despite being the best in our current comparison, the nubia Red Magic 3S construction is a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier than OPPO Reno2.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit more powerful CPU than OPPO Reno2, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Reno2 and the nubia Red Magic 3S have really similar screens, because although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit lower pixel amount in each display inch, it also counts with a little larger display.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a slightly better camera than OPPO Reno2, and although they both have a 0.5 inches back camera sensor, the same diafragm aperture and a 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a lot higher video definition. The OPPO Reno2 has much more storage for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the OPPO Reno2 also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features longer battery life than OPPO Reno2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.