Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 is a bit better than the OPPO Reno2, getting a 76.1 score against 73.9. The Galaxy A22 is a newer cellphone, and it is also thinner and a little bit lighter than the OPPO Reno2. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy A22 has newer 12 version while OPPO Reno2 has Android 10, providing a couple additional features and performance optimizations.
OPPO Reno2 features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A22, because it has a little bit larger screen, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a better count of pixels per inch in the display. OPPO Reno2 counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy A22, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Reno2 also has a higher amount of RAM.
OPPO Reno2 counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have a 48 MP back-facing camera, the OPPO Reno2 also has a larger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and a way higher (4K) video quality. The OPPO Reno2 features a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
OPPO Reno2 counts with a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.