Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G is slightly better than the OPPO Reno2, with a 79.9 score against 73.9. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A25 5G has a newer 14 version while OPPO Reno2 has Android 10. Although Galaxy A25 5G is just a bit heavier than the OPPO Reno2, it's thinner and notably newer.
The OPPO Reno2 features a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little more vivid screen than OPPO Reno2, although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a just a little worse pixels number per inch in the screen, they both have a display with the same size.
OPPO Reno2 shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a back-facing camera with lesser MP resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture and a lot larger sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photographs.
The OPPO Reno2 counts with a bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits 512 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with better battery performance than OPPO Reno2, because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.