Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-18 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A5 (2017) is a bit better than the OPPO Reno2, getting a 75.8 score against 73.9. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy A5 (2017) is older than OPPO Reno2, it's design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. OPPO Reno2 counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Reno2 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A5 (2017) and OPPO Reno2 have very similar displays, because although the Galaxy A5 (2017) has a really smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the display. The OPPO Reno2 has much more memory for apps and games than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 256 GB internal memory.
OPPO Reno2 shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a way more megapixels camera in the back, a bigger aperture for better photography and videos in low light environments and a way better video quality. OPPO Reno2 counts with superior battery duration than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.