Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-18 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is better than OPPO Reno2, with an 83.8 score against 73.9. The Samsung Galaxy A50 design is lighter and thinner than the OPPO Reno2, even though both were released only a couple of months apart. Galaxy A50 has a screen that's very similar to the OPPO Reno2 one, although the Galaxy A50 has a quite smaller display, a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit lower pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 and OPPO Reno2 both feature quite similar CPUs, and although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The OPPO Reno2 features a much better memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the OPPO Reno2 also has more internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Reno2 shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the OPPO Reno2 also has a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition, a way larger sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photographs and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy A50's battery lifetime is very similar to OPPO Reno2's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.