Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-18 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is better than the OPPO Reno2, having a general score of 86.6 against 73.9. Even though the Galaxy A50s and the OPPO Reno2 were released only 0 months apart, the Galaxy A50s is thinner and lighter. Both phones we compare here include the same Android 10 OS (operating system). The OPPO Reno2 and the Galaxy A50s count with really similar screens, although the Galaxy A50s has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, a quite smaller screen and a quite lower pixels number in each inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has just a little better processing power than OPPO Reno2, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. OPPO Reno2 counts with a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB, the OPPO Reno2 also has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A50s's battery performance is just as good as the battery lifetime in OPPO Reno2. Galaxy A50s counts with a camera that is very similar to the OPPO Reno2 one, and although the Galaxy A50s has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photography, they both have the same resolution back camera, the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same video resolution and the same sensor size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.