Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-18 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is way better than OPPO Reno2's overall score of 73.9. The Galaxy A52 is a somewhat thinner device than the OPPO Reno2, but both weight the same. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a processor that's very similar to OPPO Reno2's processor, and although the Samsung Galaxy A52 has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Galaxy A52 and OPPO Reno2 count with similar displays, both have a greater pixel number per inch of screen, exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution and a screen with the same size. OPPO Reno2 counts with a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy A52, because although it has an external SD slot that holds 512 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage.
Galaxy A52 takes slightly better photographs and videos than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back and a larger back camera sensor capturing higher quality photos.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a bit better battery life than OPPO Reno2, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.