Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the OPPO Reno2, with a 91.3 score against 73.9. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has newer 12 version while OPPO Reno2 has Android 10, giving some extra features. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G construction has the same weight than OPPO Reno2, but it's somewhat thinner.
OPPO Reno2 and Samsung Galaxy A52 5G count with very similar processing units, and although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. OPPO Reno2 and Samsung Galaxy A52 5G both feature quite similar screens, they have a display with the same size, an equal 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and the same screen density.
The OPPO Reno2 features a bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than OPPO Reno2, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G captures slightly better pictures and videos than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a bigger camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs and a camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.