Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s is a lot better than the OPPO Reno2, with a 91.1 score against 73.9. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A52s has newer 11 version and OPPO Reno2 has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy A52s is a somewhat thinner phone than OPPO Reno2, but both of them have equal weights.
Samsung Galaxy A52s features just a little better performance than OPPO Reno2, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. OPPO Reno2 and Samsung Galaxy A52s count with really similar displays, both have a greater pixels count per inch of screen, an equal 1080 x 2400px resolution and a screen of the same size.
OPPO Reno2 counts with a bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A52s, because although it has an external memory slot that allows 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52s has a bit longer battery performance than OPPO Reno2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Galaxy A52s has a bit better camera than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a way better 64 MP resolution back camera and a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.