Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 is better than the OPPO Reno2, getting a overall score of 87.5 against 73.9. The Samsung Galaxy A71 construction is a little lighter and thinner than the OPPO Reno2, even though both were released only 4 months apart. These phones include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A71 has a newer 11 version while OPPO Reno2 has Android 10.
The Galaxy A71's processing unit is just as good as OPPO Reno2's processing unit, and although the Galaxy A71 has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. OPPO Reno2 features a little bit better screen than Galaxy A71, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the OPPO Reno2 also counts with a quite greater pixels density.
Galaxy A71 features a bit better camera than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a bigger sensor shooting better quality pictures and a back camera with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution.
The OPPO Reno2 has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A71, and although they both have a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the OPPO Reno2 also has 128 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A71 has just a little better battery performance than OPPO Reno2, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.