Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot better than OPPO Reno2, getting a 92.9 score against 73.9. These phones have the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so they should provide you the same OS features. The Galaxy A71 5G UW design is newer, a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than OPPO Reno2. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit better processor than OPPO Reno2. They have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW and OPPO Reno2 have very similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bit larger screen. Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots slightly better photos and videos than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution and a larger back camera sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality.
The OPPO Reno2 features a better storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits 488 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a bit longer battery duration than OPPO Reno2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.